Flitch had built a genuinely impressive product — 500,000 pages of furniture from 100+ UK retailers in one place.
What they hadn't built was a single SEO foundation. We built the entire infrastructure from scratch — then competed.
Flitch had built a genuinely powerful furniture comparison engine, but the scale of the site was working against it.
Pages weren't being indexed, crawl budget was wasted on the wrong URLs, and the organic opportunity across thousands of product pages was essentially untouched.
From a site Google could barely crawl to 21,000 monthly visitors. Year one built the foundations. Year two delivered the traffic.
Flitch had the product. They didn't have the infrastructure for Google to find it, or the authority to compete with brands that had been online for a decade. We built both.
With the technical foundation complete, we mapped the keyword opportunity across 50+ furniture categories. Bunk beds. Bar tables. Hammocks. Garden swings. 800 keywords on page one in year one — including position three for 'desks for sale', above Furniture Village. By year two: 1,800 keywords, and position three for 'M&S cushions', ranking above M&S itself.
Editors don't want stories about sofas. But they want stories about what makes a home look cheap, how to stay warm without the heating, and what interior experts actually buy. We found those angles, placed Flitch's voice into national and lifestyle press, and earned links that a furniture site simply cannot buy. Every link DR70 or above.
A 500,000-page catalogue with no meta titles, no redirect structure, no canonical tags, no schema markup, and no pagination logic. Every one of those issues was suppressing rankings across the entire site before we could target a single keyword. We built the complete infrastructure first — because without it, nothing else would work.
The order mattered as much as the work itself. With half a million pages and no foundation, we couldn't target a keyword until the site could be read.
With 500,000 pages and none of the foundations Google needs to understand them, targeting any keyword was premature. The site was haemorrhaging authority through broken redirects, confusing Google with self-referencing canonicals, and failing to communicate what any page was about through meta titles.
We fixed every structural issue before writing a single piece of content. That discipline meant when we did start targeting categories, the pages had a fair chance of competing — instead of fighting infrastructure problems at the same time.
With the foundation solid, the question was which categories to target first. Not every furniture category has the same search volume, intent, or competition. We mapped the full opportunity across bunk beds, desks, garden furniture, and 47 other categories, then prioritised by where Flitch had the most to gain with the least resistance.
By the end of year one, 800 keywords were on page one. Position three for 'desks for sale' — a term with thousands of monthly searches — demonstrated that the strategy was working faster than even we expected.
By year two, the ambition shifted. With 800 keywords already ranking, we turned to the tougher terms — categories where Dreams, Furniture Village, and M&S had spent years building authority. Competing for 'desks for sale' against Furniture Village. Ranking above M&S for their own brand-adjacent searches.
Getting above an incumbent in their own category is the proof that domain authority and content quality can close a gap that seemed insurmountable. 1,800 keywords on page one by year two.
A furniture site cannot easily earn national press coverage by writing about furniture. Journalists need angles with broader appeal. We found those angles in the spaces adjacent to what Flitch sells: home styling, interior mistakes, cost-of-living solutions, and expert buying guides.
The Sun, Women and Home, Tom's Guide, and the Daily Record all covered Flitch-adjacent stories. Each placement earned a high-authority backlink that fed directly into the ranking campaigns already in progress.
The compounding effect became visible in year two. Technical SEO meant every new piece of content had a fair chance. Content strategy meant we were targeting the right terms. Digital PR meant those pages had the authority to compete for them.
None of these phases would have produced 21,000 monthly visitors alone. It was the sequence that made the number possible — foundations first, then content, then the authority to compete at the top.
We had a site with half a million pages and no idea how to get any of them ranking. Dexter Media didn't just solve the technical problems — they built the entire organic growth engine. Competing with Dreams and Furniture Village felt impossible until it wasn't.